Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Yeti
I've said many times, the judge should NOT have even
mentioned the other girls abductions to the jury. There
was no need to bring in extraneous information into this
trial.
872 posted on 08/07/2002 5:55:25 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies ]


To: the Deejay
I've said many times, the judge should NOT have even mentioned the other girls abductions to the jury. There was no need to bring in extraneous information into this trial.

My interpretation. The jurors were not sequestered as they should have been and Mudd knows it.

DUSEK and the rest of the country KNEW how similar it was in MO, and VICINITY that it would prejudice the jury. BUT PREDUJICE THEM for the DEFENSE, so DUSEK and MUDD had to INSTRUCT the jury. ANYTHING that the jury sees that PREDUJICES FOR THE PROSECUTION (like watching CTV or LOCAL NEWS about the CASE) is allowed.

THAT IS THE FACT, JACK!

894 posted on 08/07/2002 6:13:00 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson