[Greg Weston]

>>>If it's physically possible, at all, maybe you can explain it,<<<

Maybe you can explain how you think it's not possible first.

[theirjustdue]

"Maybe you can explain how you think it's not possible first."

Well, do the math Greg. Six foot plus and four foot. Either DW would have to be a contortionist, or his head would have been sticking more than two feet through the headboard.

You may have a different opinion, but neither scenario seems very likely, IMO.

[PFKEY]

Greg I'm posting this to you just to bolster your opinion of DW guilt and expectation that the jury will return a guilty verdict.

I have just completed reading the days previous thread and followed the judges instruction to the jury and the prosecutions contentions about not having to prove how certain aspects of the crime was committed.

My take from what the judge's instructions were to the jury relating to if you find defendant guilty of kidnapping then you also have to find defendant guilty of murder. Or conversely if you find not guilty of kidnapping then you have to find not guilty on murder.

I also recall reading that the judge stated in some form or fashion that the finger print in the RV was sufficient proof of kidnapping.

So, I do think the jury could easily come to a guilty verdict on both kidnapping and murder based solely on the fingerprint and blood/DNA in the RV.