Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FresnoDA
Fres, I was reading the report of Dusek slamming his hand down repeatedly to mimic the sound of Danielle's head being "...slammed against the headboard while David Westerfield repeatedly raped her."

Imagine how tall (or how small) this child was. Imagine he has her positioned so that her head is hitting the headboard of the bed. For the sake of argument, let's assume the missionary position. This should have the effect of slamming DW's head right through the drywall!

Granted he could have been forcing her to perform oral copulation, but the missionary position seems a bit farfetched.

I assume Fres that at some point in your life (unlike certain other posters who will remain unnamed) you have occasionally seen a fully erect, turgid penile member.

Now try to imagine gaining entry with such a war-club into the vagina of an admittedly small 8 year old. No way. Doesn't fit. Now I'm not saying he couldn't have simply placed his member in a stimulating position. That could be, but as to actual penetration, I don't think so.

So the fist-pounding by Dusek may have imitated a sound, but I dare say it wasn't this poor child slamming her head into his headboard.

I also love the one about his dumping the body. Can someone please tell me why the seemingly "rational" and "intelligent" DW decides to provide the police with a perfect crime scene to investigate when he could easily have disposed of her forever in the ocean, a lake, a cave, 6 feet under, dismembered and strewn, immolated, you name it.

But no, DW, that old softy, just couldn't stand the thought of not giving the cops a run for their money. It just doesn't make sense. It's illogical. But someone who had decided that it was time for the body to show up after making sure the police had their man, a person who might want their child's body back,...well, you get the picture.

I vote GUILT NOT PROVEN. He may have done it, but you, Mr. Dusek, didn't prove it.

433 posted on 08/07/2002 1:02:07 PM PDT by Doc Savage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Doc Savage

I assume Fres that at some point in your life (unlike certain other posters who will remain unnamed) you have occasionally seen a fully erect, turgid penile member.

Uhm....gee Doc...I didn't know you cared....HAAAA...LOL

Do I have to post a turgid picture??? (Please say no...)

447 posted on 08/07/2002 1:13:48 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

To: Doc Savage
tur·gid   Pronunciation Key  (tûraltjaltd)
adj.
  1. Excessively ornate or complex in style or language; grandiloquent: turgid prose.
  2. Swollen or distended, as from a fluid; bloated: a turgid bladder; turgid veins.

452 posted on 08/07/2002 1:17:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson