To: shezza
"San Diego channel 10 commentators just said that to find him guilty, they'll have to find that there was evidence he entered the Van Dam house."
Of course! That' what I've been saying since the prelim. And I can't get past that breaking & entering. Since I've not been able to get past it, I couldn't find him guilty. Plain & simple. I don't give a rat's rear end about the blood drops, hairs, etc.
First & foremost, Dusek had to prove that breaking & entering. Hasn't done it. Not in the prelim, not in the trial.
To: All
See, Feldman CORRECTED himself on something he had said to the jury before the break. He just didn't leave it lye. Dusek flat out lied to the jury & Feldman's pointing out the lies.
To: the Deejay; All
Danille L. and her girlfriend came here and told you that they had been in the MH around Oct. 2000 and their fingerprints were in the MH. When I asked the fingerprint examiner "how long could those fingerprints have been there...?
Fourteen months. so DVD's figerprints could have been there for 14 months. Was their testimony resonable to you?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson