[shezza]

Mr. Dusek said the snapshots contained kiddie porn. We don't know who took those pictures. A mother and her daughter in the hot tub. We see two chairs. Whoever took the picture was sitting in the other chair.

Suddenly DAW is a child pornographer? THe argument is one of prejudice, not logic. And this is kiddie porn, according to the DA, a picture of Danielle L. in her bathing suit. Isn't that stretching it? There are too many explanations. It just doesn't come together.

[shezza]

Allowed Susan's daughters Danielle and CHristine Gonzales in his home. Lived with DAW for two years. Had been in the motorhome--had driven the motorhome--all the doors were open. We don't know if the condition of the motorhome when you saw it was the same as it had been.

Susan knows David as well as anyone, doesn't she? Laundry--tossing over bannister to laundry area. Either you accept the prosecution spin that he was a neatnik, or you listen to the witnesses.

We know that the Van Dam kids were over, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday of that week. They come in the front door, they were in the living room, they went upstairs, they went into the garage, (encouraging jury to listen to the taped interviews with Keene)--the kids are all over. And when the laundry gets tossed down to the floor, there's the transfer.