On their theory, he's got her, he's gotta get her out of there. He gets to the top of the bannister, and there's a fingerprint at the top of the bannister, and he turned like this, as though whoever was coming down turned and looked, or slipped. But it excludes David Westerfield. Where's the evidence? Is there only one reasonable interpretation there?
So because the doorhandle was reversed, the dog doesn't bark, the door has a reversed lock, the police asked them to tell them everyone who was in that house. It took them 15 hours as the van Dam's decided what was relevant and what was not relevant to the investigation, while their child was missing.
A babysitter was supposed to be in the house. Brenda testified that there was supposed to be a babysitter. So if they come back and tell you David Westerfield knew that there was going to be no one in the house, go back and check your notes.
No evidence that DAW was in the house.
Layla hairs in motorhome--(didn't catch it all)...
Denise, Rich, Keith all said dog jumped all over them, was a pain. Rich (?) knew the residence, had been there before, had been shown the house by the van Dams, he didn't even know whose bedroom was whose.