Replies

Also Daddy please love me. Please forgive me, next time I'll be better".

I worked on a book (editing) by an incest survivor who finally took her father to court after she grew up. This is EXACTLY the kind of thing she'd write or say...she was obsessed, as a child, with pleasing her father in every way possible to keep him off her. The sadistic man would punish her for the slightest infraction of his arbitrary and ever-changing rules by raping her....it started on her first day of school, when she was six.

In that particular case, which became rather famous for awhile, the father could be brought to court years after the incest because he'd started again on one of his granddaughters, and that brave little kid testified and put him in jail.

Anyway, if Danielle wrote this "apology" in her diary, I'm convinced she was an incest victim. Actually, the first time I saw her photo, I got the impression that she was an abused child. Maybe Damon loaned her out to a friend, and the friend got rough. This is not a far-fetched idea. People like Damon do things beyond imagining.

Loaned her out? Yeah. I still want to know if that family connects to the pedophile ring that's right there by them.

Interesting that it took a foreign country to out the child rapists, instead of the San Diego PD, isn't it? And I wonder if Danielle will show up on their tapes as one of the children they raped?

Kim, I think that's something you should sink your teeth into. Much more productive than the energies you've spent here, I think. Something just might come of it, and your time would have been well spent!

The only problem with this "alleged" journal entry of Danielle's is that there is no testimony that it exists.

The man, Douglas Pierce, who claimed it exists was never called as a witness, why not? He's just what the defense needs to clinch the pointing finger of doubt at Damon.

I have maintained from the beginning that DP is a lying coconut and his claims about the journal are totally bogus.

That's why he was not called to testify, and the journal wasn't used, because there is nothing unusual or sinister in it.

The claims about the journal are slanderous rumour started by Douglas Pierce.