I am anxious to hear how DW came home drunk from Dad's, entered a home (with no trace left behind) that he knew would be unlocked and where he could be recognized, grabbed a good-sized child, whisked her down a street where people knew him, kept her alive in his home until daylight (he miracuosly knew that parents would not discover child gone until 9:00 am), transferred her (with no trace left behind) to his MH and drove same MH back to his neighborhood where LE were combing every square foot, at some time between driving to the beach and desert and wherever, deposited her body at Dehesa Rd., where flies decided to behave in a delayed manner never seen before by forensic entomologists.
I can hardly wait and I'm not even a sci-fi fan.
Mudd is basic in reasoning that if her print was in the Motor Home, then the Jury has to arrive at the conclusion that she was indeed kidnapped by DW. Forget that there is no evidence of him in the home.
Will it matter that she MAY have played in there? What did the trial accomplish? They had her print?!!
If Judge Mudd instructs the Jury they must find that DW kidnapped Danielle, because her print was in the Motor Home, then DW might as well take the stand.
I heard the judge this morning, and it didn't sound like he was giving DW any question of the doubt...print = kidnapping. Kidnapping = Murder.
Someone, anyone..tell me I am Wrong. Please.
sw