To: VRWC_minion
So, knowing what you know now - taking the bugmen testimonies into consideration, as well as the forensic evidence - would you vote to convict or to acquit? And why?
To: JudyB1938
Convict. Short answer=I believe the hard physical evidence cannot be explained without assuming she was abducted by Westerfield. I believe the defenses explanation's of the presense of the that evidence is so remotely possible its impossible. I believe the fly folks have overstated the ability of their science to demonstrate they can determine a maximum date and that after this case there will be some harder peer review like studies of the science and better conrolled studies done with varying environments.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson