Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: shezza; All
OTOH, the way I heard Judge Mudd say it..Is that there is evidence that LINKS DW to the child, therefor they can conclude that he did indeed kidnapp and murder her.

In other words, IMO, if the jury is convinced that the fiber, hair and prints link DW to Danielle, then they must assume that he kidnapped her and killed her. (Nevermind how they got there?)

Someone tell me I'm wrong...please.

sw

82 posted on 08/02/2002 10:58:34 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: spectre

Attention all FR-Refugees....at the direction of the Executive Board...all Westie/VD discussions have been moved to Fort Refugee until further notice.....

Activate your logon cookies, and proceed to: http://pub3.ezboard.com/bfreerepublicrefugeeboard5175

FDA - signing out.....


83 posted on 08/02/2002 11:01:23 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
I wish you COULD be told you're wrong. I am really scared. Imagine how poor Westerfield must feel!
84 posted on 08/02/2002 11:01:54 AM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
Is that there is evidence that LINKS DW to the child, therefor they can conclude,/B> that he did indeed kidnapp and murder her.

They would be free to conclude otherwise also.

89 posted on 08/02/2002 11:26:46 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson