[bvw]

A missed recollection is not a lie. A whole pattern of missed recollections is another story, but there is not a enough of a pattern here. A coincidence, but no clear pattern. So, no, it is not a lie.

[John Jamieson]

DW has never testified under oath.

Also the tape we heard was edited per Dusek. How can you claim something was left out of a tape, that was edited. WE KNOW STUFF WAS CUT OUT! Means nothing.

[cyncooper]

A missed recollection is not a lie.

Well, we disagree about drycleaning trip #1, certainly. Why would he readily remember trip #2 later and the police were able to confirm trip #2 and retrieve the clothes, but he never revealed trip #1. BTW, trip #2 seems to be his clothes from Friday night. He wanted them back Monday (same day service) but the cleaners said it was too late. He ran them over pretty much as soon as police left his house early afternoon of 2/4. Maybe he thought the police would find out what he was seen wearing Friday night and wanted to be able to present them to them, freshly cleaned?

What are your thoughts as to why he didn't tell police about calling his son about checking the house and subsequently telling them he found a door unlocked because *he* forgot to lock it?