I posted Det. Tomsavec (sp??) testimony the other day. He was called by the defense and I actually posted the entire direct exam. He stated then that at the body recovery site he didn't notice the dogs react.
On cross-exam by Dusek he said he wasn't really observing the dogs,though. It struck me because he said they could smell an odor when they got on the ground. (But when Dusek clarified he wasn't really watching for their reactions it made me wonder if they had reacted and the handler would have to testify---no reason to, the body was there, they alreay knew).
I had posted the excerpt because of the greasy drag marks made by parts of her body/entrails.
I have a question regaurding the "greasy trail" if this trail was indeed her blood/tissue why would they need to get a DNA sample from her bone marrow?
I mean especially if it is greasy as in sticky? That would indicate they would not even have to rehydrate the blood as they do with blood spots that have dried up.