To: Krodg
Very well put.
To: John Jamieson
You're very informed about this case. Do you think we will ever know who did it? I'm not convinced Westerfield is the guilty one. It's not up to the defense to find the murderer but no one is looking elsewhere, right? LE has their man. If Westerfield is found not guilty and no one else is charged, his life is mostly ruined. Better than being executed of course but a shame for someone that probably was just minding his own business. Hope you're still on here tonight. Thanks....
To: All
I been studying the bugmen's calculations, comparing one with another. As we progressed from one to another each took into consideration MORE possible temperature sets, MORE experimental tests results from MORE researches and became MORE conservative in using the magot mass corrections. Each time the range of possible egg deposition became a little wider.
Making the corrections for Goff's minor math errors, makes little difference in his conclusions. Each man tried to do a better job of widening the interval to see if the prosecution's theory of the crime could work, and yet all concluded that it COULD NOT.
I think ALL were intellicually honest and each felt a serious need to do the job right. My hat's off to them for their hard work and clear thinking. Anyone of them that could have made Dusek's case would have a job testifing for the prosecution for the rest of their lives. They applied the science as best it could be done and all came to the same conclusion. DW couldn't have done it alone.
To: John Jamieson
I'm glad you understood what I was saying. I want so much to believe in 'Justice for all' because I don't know when something like this could happen to me. As much as I didn't like being a victim, I don't know if I could handle being convicted for a crime I didn't do.
363 posted on
08/02/2002 11:02:46 PM PDT by
Krodg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson