[cyncooper]

Hey, John. I've seen you and others talking about the language the judge used the other day about a witness possibly having a conviction for a felony.

I'm just starting to read the transcripts for today's hearing (Yes! they're up!). Looks like that isn't the case afterall. But the admitted untruthfulness language remains.

The judge speaketh:

WE HAVE ADMISSIONS OF UNTRUTHFULNESS. WE HAVE NOT, HOWEVER, SEEN WITNESSES WITH CONVICTIONS FOR FELONY OR CONDUCT AMOUNTING TO A MISDEMEANOR THAT I AM AWARE OF, SO IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THOSE BRACKETED PORTIONS SHOULD COME OUT AS WELL.

[John Jamieson]

The judge either changed his mind or a witness did not testify that was supposed to.