Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Interesting on negative dog searches being known to jury. Prosecution would not have brought up negative searches of VD house, SUV, DW house. I don't recall any defense witnesses on dogs. If it came out on cross I don't remember it. When 180frank was on stand I think discussion was only on motorhome, could Feldman have even brought up other searches at that point?
29 posted on 08/02/2002 8:22:37 AM PDT by clearvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: clearvision
The reason I ask about the search dogs (as opposed to cadaver dogs) is the jury can only consider what is presented at trial, so if it was not (and it may have been---that's why I'm wondering) they cannot consider it in their deliberations.

33 posted on 08/02/2002 8:29:45 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson