I would have voted the same way - but can you give me a hint to the basis of your acceptance of reasonable doubt in that case. I want to be able to relate your mindset to this case. For example - John and myself were on the same side you were for OJ - not proven - but we are not on the same side here - what was so different about that case for you?
what was so different about that case for you?Too long to explain and I have to go right now but its basically the sum total of the liklihood of all the evidence occuring. Taken individually I would agree with you but taken in total I cannot.
It would be like someone winning the grand prize lotto twice in one day.