Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: YaYa123
Several jurors appeared disgruntled after Hall repeatedly asked if he'd understood Dusek's questions correctly, and then refused to directly answer them.

Soon after a few jurors let out audible sighs, Dusek ended his questioning.

Whether the jury is sighing or rolling their eyes doesn't mean anything regarding how they are weighing the evidence. A juror could believe the person general testimony while at the same time believe the person is ducking a question. I think the reports of the juries facial and other reactions are interesting but useless for determining their impressions.

108 posted on 08/02/2002 12:28:34 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Assuming that this is true, it sounds to me like Dusek thought he was losing the jury, not winning them, so he quit.
111 posted on 08/02/2002 12:40:08 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Hall was not ducking questions. He may have been perplexed for a while that Dusek was asking the same question over and over without success. Dusek's overdone cross-examination only served to underscore the desperation of the prosecution.
122 posted on 08/02/2002 12:53:10 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson