Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: chance33_98
"The assault was toward a canine officer," Judge Mary Spicer said. "An officer is an officer, whether they have two legs or whether they have four legs."

That is assinine. The "officer" (dog) should then be charged with excessive force for biting the man's head. A dog is a dog is a dog. Calling a dog an officer, but not holding the dog responsible for its own behavior is a double standard.

6 posted on 08/01/2002 4:46:21 AM PDT by You Gotta Be Kidding Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: You Gotta Be Kidding Me
I know what you are trying to say....but that dog was being responsible. The article does not state whether the man was threatening in anyway towards the officers. If he was, then that is exactly what the dog is trained to do. The dog would doing his job. I can't believe the dog would of bit the guy for no reason. He must of been resisting or something.
7 posted on 08/01/2002 4:58:20 AM PDT by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson