Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jrabbit
To stop predjudicial information from coming out. The prosecution may have traded it for Barbara's testimony? Lots of wheeling and dealing going on. Something like: "You seal up my client's smartass remark(s) made during illegal questioning, and I'll not call Barb to tell the world about the VDs."
957 posted on 08/01/2002 10:58:16 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]


To: John Jamieson
The prosecution really wouldn't have the option of a deal. If DW requested a lawyer during questioning the officers HAVE to stop asking questions.
They then can 1) arrest him and get his lawyer. 2) not arrest him and let him get the lawyer so they can question him again.
To not give him his right to counsel makes all statements after that null and void as far as testimony. Thats why we've heard his testimony up until the point he asked for counsel when he went to station that day.
960 posted on 08/01/2002 11:07:26 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
John, is it possible that Barb is also a felon and cannot testify?
979 posted on 08/02/2002 6:42:42 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson