About the state of Danielle's body and the SCENE right around it.
We need to consider whether the body was laid down near the tree and drug to it, or whether the DRAG MARKS and the clumps of hair along a trail leading back to the NORTH (I believe) are correct.
If Danielle's body was taken right after she was killed (known as the DW did it theory) then only items the animals carried off/drug off would be around the body. Unless the animals (coyote waited 2 weeks or so for the body to decay/mummify then pulled it under the tree.
IF Danielle was kept somewhere until her body had DRIED OUT (the mummy theory) and then was taken to Dehesa Rd, carried out of a vehicle (say, in a sack/blanket with maybe blue/grey fibers) and dumped out onto the ground; then drug up under the tree. This then might account for the clumps of hair in a trail following the drag marks from the NORTH.
I am trying to be as unbiased as possible so we can examine the possibilities that might explain when Danielle was put at Dehesa Rd better than all of this BUGOTISM.
Not familiar with the distance involved but my assumption was that any dragging would have been from pulling the orange blanket out from under her.
I also would put more weight on her being dumped within 24 hours of her abduction certainly not 12 days. Further, no signs on the body that it was eslwhere.
So no matter who did it, I find the bug guy's dates problematic.