To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I'm definitely not an expert in the field, but the science is a solid and useful one. It is just my slightly educated opinion that the prosecution has a problem with the time of placement of the body, due to the entomological data. I haven't been following this sordid case too closely, and I don't know what all the other evidence is for the prosecution, but based on the fly data, and the inconsistency in the story of how DW got the child out of the house, I think I would vote not-guilty if on that jury. But like I said, they all seem to be scum, so I don't care if they're all found guilty.
To: agrandis
Unfortunately, the truth will never come out in the debacle. It seems doubtful that anyone has or will have learned a lesson about "lifestyles" or any of this other sordid stuff.
There are two Van Dam boys, they should be the concern now. That doesn't appear to be the case either, that is even more sad, IMO.
334 posted on
08/01/2002 11:26:52 AM PDT by
Jaded
To: agrandis
Thanks for your input - very valuable here. So - is it your opinion - that both sides could deal with the mintutia of this entomological stuff and slant it a bit one way or the other - go back and forth forever - but basically - it's obvious - she was not there back in early feb. but placed there in mid feb.?
338 posted on
08/01/2002 11:28:32 AM PDT by
mommya
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson