Replies

You noticed too. When the going gets tuff, the tuff go for the fibers that may or may not have a comon source.

The only reason the prosecution can't prove DW did it, is they claim the perp went and destroyed all the evidence on them! The dog (or bugs) ate my homework approach..... therefore he must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Did I miss something today, or is the date based on the beetle activity still unrefutted? Unless that evidence is challenged all the miscalculations in the world won't make a difference.

"The only reason the prosecution can't prove DW did it, is they claim the perp went and destroyed all the evidence on them! The dog (or bugs) ate my homework approach..... therefore he must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."

A little late in the game for Dusuck to be claiming that, isn't it? According to his opening statement, I thought he was going to SHOW us how DW got into the house, took Danielle, killed her, and dumped her body? So far, he has yet to prove any of those, and the best he can do is, "Sorry, we can't link the fibers to a common source because DW got rid of all the evidence!"

Ok...he got rid of his orange blankie, his cowboy boots, the blue/grey fiber source...but DOESN'T get rid of the jacket with the supposed "blood" on it? Either he's innocent, or he's the dumbest criminal on the face of the earth.