To: cyncooper
What about the FACT, the dog(s) didn't find a FRESH TRACE of Danielle in or near the RV? And the FACT their handler cheated & lied simply because *he* wanted DW on trial? Huh, how 'bout *those* FACTS? What do you think the jury will do with those facts?
To: the Deejay
SWISS CHEESE mean anything to you. Dusek has lot's of hot air in holes. but no substance. I almost feel sorry for him.
Maybe that is why Mudd has been so supportive of him. He knows he's been "dun in". by the DA and LE both. I'd be madd as #3!! if I had that going on in my Court room.
OTOH, with the vacation etc. he may be "throwing the case" not a fair trial. Jury not kept away from media etc. All just to teach em a lesson..... He's in charge??
Is he taking the chess board and going home? JMO a being a bit of a devil advocate, of course!
To: the Deejay
What about the FACT, the dog(s) didn't find a FRESH TRACE of Danielle in or near the RV? And the FACT their handler cheated & lied simply because *he* wanted DW on trial? Huh, how 'bout *those* FACTS? What do you think the jury will do with those facts?They may agree with you. I will not be upset by whatever the jury does.
No need to be upset with me for my opinion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson