[hoosiermama]

Yes! That is his job to suggest a source (doubt) Done all the time. It made Dusek have to test a lot of fibers....But don't be surprised if somewhere in the closing arguments Feldy says "NOT EVERY SOURCE WAS TESTED" CHeck the testimony of the cross! Didn't he get stipulation that some but not all were tested? I haven't read it, but bet it's there somewhere.

That's how the game of COURT works. Yes it's a game..sort of like chess. CHECK and CHECK MATE! You get the other side to say what you need....Good lawyering!

[cyncooper]

Oh, I don't begrudge Feldman doing that kind of argument and fully expect it.

[Jrabbit]

I agree with you. Also, if anyone is trying to mislead the jury, it's Dusek. As soon as he got the report from his own expert, Faulkner, this case should have been concentrated on finding out who REALLY killed Danielle. If she was killed and didn't die as the result of an accident, that is. IMO!!!!!