[hoosiermama]

COuld be, But again ist is not relevant if the fiber expert testified they were similar but not mecessarily from the same source. No need to discuss! MUTE topic. Feldmanized!
That's why we're not hearing anymore fiber testimony. Only if source was IDed and tied to a specific DW item is it relevant. Similar source just doesn't do it. Read the Cross exam. I think you'll find that Feldy got her to testify any time, any similar but not identical source. Or something close to that. Stick a for in it!

[hoosiermama]

PS Burden of prof is in Duseck's corner....He produced no matching item! ANd yes that's why perps destroy evidence. Could have?? IMO Not likely a Condit!

[gigi]

Hi, are you guys still here?

[cyncooper]

Hoosiermama I'll just point this out in what you think the fiber testimony should be.

One of the lawyers brought out from the fiber witness that he could pluck a fiber from his jacket right there and have her analyze it and the MOST she could say is that the fiber was similar to the fibers in his jacket.

That is the limitation placed on them by the court!

Then common sense takes over and the jury gets to add two and two.

[cyncooper]

That's why we're not hearing anymore fiber testimony.

AND we just heard fiber testimony yesterday. Feldman tried to pull a fast one and mislead the jury on what the source of the orange fibers could be.

Foiled by Dusek.