(2)1 fiber on Danielle that COULD be a perfect match. Did it have the root, or was it just partial. How many hairs with the fiber? Was it a HUGE WAD?
(3)Danielle had been in DW's house, and COULD have gotten the fiber in her hair then. Police were in DW's house, the MH, the SUV, tracking orange fibers possibly.
(4)Orange fibers in the MH (right?) Would be coming from DW carrying them from house to MH.
(5) Orange Fibers found around Danielle's body (were there, how many?)
(6) Blue/Grey Fibers ... this is where you can take over.
(7)Orange fibers in SUV. HOw many?
The other evidence is:
2 drops positive for Daneille's DNA, but never proved to be blood. The one by the MH bathroom was obviously not new or the dogs would have HIT on it.
The INVESTIGATOR testified it could be up to a YEAR OLD.
1 partial print in the MH in under the edge of a cabinet. Not found on first examination. Found on re-examination. (to my best recollection)
ONE hair found in sink trap. No attempt to identify if other hairs in sink, or whose they were, or whether Danielle's was first in/last in. Only that this 1 hair was there.
Easily transferred during cookie sale to something in the DW home that eventually could end up taken into MH.
SO, that pretty much sums up the PHYSICAL EVIDENCE.
I Plan to keep a working list where we can eliminate or not be able to eliminate each item.
This just made me think. If there were more hair in sink drain, or other debris for that matter, wouldn't the ORDER of those items tell us how long it had been there?
IE if Jennifers, ex-GF, and THEN DVD's hair had been found in that order it would show that DVD had been in MH before the other two. If DW's hair, Jennifer's hair then DVD's hair were found she was in there more recently than Jennifer had last been.
Other question before fiber lady untangled hair/orange fiber did she take a digital photo of it?