Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
There is no way you can allow testimony based on speculation like that to establish the *source* for a fiber.

That is exactly what the PROSECUTION is attempting to do. They have no facts, no proof, it is all speculation.

Tell me if I am incorrect.

178 posted on 07/31/2002 11:09:05 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
Tell me if I am incorrect.

You are incorrect! :)

The prosecution has not tried to tell the jury *what* the items were, just that there were items---blue and orange---that left fibers on Danielle that were also found in his home, bed, MH and SUV.

They are saying Danielle would not have those fibers on her if she had not been with him over the weekend.

246 posted on 07/31/2002 12:36:13 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson