They never entered into evidence a photograph of that fiber in the hair mass, did they?
Not even a deteriorating polaroid like the sole picture of the drop of dna on the green jacket?
It would be very useful to see a context for that fiber and the surrounding tangle of hair. Oops, maybe that's why. /sarcasm
I agree, how on earth could she offer the expert opinion that it got there within a couple of days of Danielle's death?
No picture that I know of - Shen held the necklace up for the court and said approximately where she found the hair wad - but I think it was already off the body when she got hold of it - should be photos of it on the body somewhere.
When I first heard that the defense wanted the lesser charge thrown into the mix - I thought it was a no brainer - she was kidnapped as part of her killing - that a little kid could not consent - but I just saw this - and have reconsidered..........
MR. BOYCE: AND SHE COULD ALSO HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THE ROOM, TOO, IN HER BEDROOM. THERE'S BLOOD IN THE BEDROOM. I MEAN THOSE ARE -- I'M NOT SAYING WE ARE RELYING ON THOSE THEORIES, BUT THOSE ARE CERTAINLY THEORIES THAT ARE OUT THERE. AND THERE'S BEEN NO EVIDENCE AS TO WHERE, WHEN, OR HOW SHE WAS MURDERED.
If you think DW did it - he could have killed her in her room - and the prints/hair/fiber in the MH could have been from another time as well. They really have not shown where she was killed. So if he killed her first - in her room - then just took her dead body to dispose of - there really was no kidnapping - was there? Just thinkin.