I was wondering why you didn't reply to my earlier posts about the pot..like when I said a video of a child being raped is WORSE than a joint. I was wondering where you were at when I wrote child porn alone is not enough evidence to convict. I wondered what your opinion was when you knew the jurors cried, but not over cartoons. I sure wondered what you thought when you found out the orange fiber defense turned out to be yet another..well NOTHING. I especially wondered what you thought about when you considered susan L's testimony about the closed curtains, the drinking problem and the serious change in personality....and I wondered what your opinion was on when she said he got 'forceful'. I wondered what you thought when she cried..
It is illogical to assume that all the compiled evidence is planted at this point and since neither you nor the defense can explain it all away...well logically, your defense of Dw is weak. I also couldn't wait to her your explanation of why her skin was mummified and I waited anxiously to hear your reaction to the now infamouse mummiologist.
Did your anxiety about Mummy Mouse cause you to pop a LOT of pills? Do you ever entertain doubt that Westerfield may not be guilty? Not even a little? No thinking about that? Not at all? Always so sure of yourself? Aren't you just a little bit bugged about the insect testimony?
And neither you nor the prosecution can explain how DW kidnapped and murdered Danielle...well not logically anyway! :-)