Replies

The Brenda who said her kids never were out by themselves, but the neighbors say different?

I'm still waiting for that testimony. The neighbor who saw the boy in front of his own house two weeks or so ago said he didn't cross the street but looked like he wanted to so she helped him.

Zero evidence van Dam kids running hither and yon unsupervised.

Zero evidence near, much less in, the MH.

Zero evidence? Oh you mean when Judge Muss sustained an objection to that very thing as it was being so testified!

I'm still waiting for that testimonyThis was about the Van Dam boy having to be helped across the street.

I don't believe you will hear the testimony. The reason is that the WITNESS started giving that TESTIMONY,and the Prosecution OBJECTED and got it struck.

So, the NEIGHBOR (in all probability) did have to help the boy, who was unsupervised, but it isn't ON THE RECORD, because the prosecution didn't want it there. The defense tried but was struck down by MUDD.

I SEE THE WRITING ON THE WALL. The Judge, the Prosecutor, Especially the SDPD and the DA have a LOT TO LOSE if DW gets NOT GUILTY. For them to admit that the other recent FEMALE CHILD RAPE/KILLINGS in the same DAMN AREA have anything to do with Danielle would make them look like they JUMPED THE GUN, ARRESTED THE WRONG MAN, and they won't admit that. You can bet you last dollar on it.

IF DW did it, Then FINE. But there is so much reason to believe he didn't. There reasonable explanations for the measly evidence the LE's managed to scrape up.

All of the important evidence that could have Proven DW absolutely DID/DID NOT do it were ignored. They were ignored because they would have proved HE DIDN'T and they ALREADY HAD MADE THE ARREST and TOLD EVERYONE THEY GOT THE KILLER. NOT ALLEDGED KILLER, but THE KILLER.

I Hope, if DW is not guilty of being involved in Danielle's death, that he gets off and SUES THE ASS OFF the SDPD and the DA, AND WINS !

That is how strongly I feel about this case, how strongly I feel that he is being railroaded, and how obvious it is to anyone that takes the time to review all the information ,all the evidence, all the testimony, and come to a conclusion.

Everyone has their own mind, their own point of view and comes to their own conclusion.

NEW info can change your point of view, just like the info about Daneille going to the park unescorted, even though Brenda says SHE WATCHED her.

The testimony about the orange fibers, and the various items worn by LE, searchers, helpers, dog trainer, etc. were interesting.

Two things I noticed were they still did not prove what the source of them was, or whether there was enough of a rarity to prove the ones on Danielle could positively link to the ones in DW's house or MH.

The second thing was that when the person that evaluated the fibers/garments was asked if the ones she had been given to be tested were the same as the ones the dogs were wearing in the pictures, she said "I DON'T KNOW".

The neighbor who saw the boy in front of his own house two weeks or so ago said he didn't cross the street but looked like he wanted to so she helped him. ******************

Let's fix that with the truth: The neighbor who saw the youngest Van Dam boy in front of her house. Said she saw the boy run across the street to get a ball and she was afraid for him crossing the street again to get back to his house so she helped him back across. She also stated that she saw no one outside watching the little boy.