Judge Mudd Says Sequestering Of Jury Possible: Van Dam case has jurors facing more Mad-Dawgging!!

Union Trib ^ | July 30, 3002 | Alex Roth

[spectre]

I am tuning out RR. He is a one man dog and pony show and dedicated to convicting David Westerfield and just lost me with his statement "Feldman went too far today...now I think there is no doubt DW is guilty and the Jury will convict".

One more time, Freepers, the Jury is most likely tuning into his show on the long commute home. They should have been sequestered.

Bye, Bye Rick...sw

[Lauratealeaf]

You can't say with 100% certainty that dw did NOT do it. A lot of circumstancial evidence is a lot better than a little. 694 posted on 7/30/02 5:28 PM Central by ~Kim4VRWC's~

So you take a lot over a little? What about a lie? Is it ok if you just lie a little to the police instead of a lot? Is it alright to leave your daughter alone in a dressing room for just a little while? Is just a little bit of pot ok? What about just a little bit of nooky with a man not your husband/woman not your wife? So, a little circumstantial evidence can convict but a lot of proof that the parents put their daughter and sons at risk is still not upsetting to you? A little bit of porn seems to hit your hissy button so what about that? Will a little bit of porn make you convict? Even though it may not even be proven without a reasonable doubt to belong to the defendant? Will you convict even though there is a lot of doubt? Isn't it really more to the point that you just want the guy convicted because you want to see the parents protected because they do a LOT of swinging? Other than that I cannot see a lot of logic in your thinking. Very little reason.

[the Deejay]

"Feldman went too far today...now I think there is no doubt DW is guilty and the Jury will convict".


Does RR even *listen* to what's being testified to in court? Otherwise, why would he make such a ridiculous statement?

Mind you, I've never logged on to RR's website or his radio program.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

At this point the average non-technical person will evaluate the hard evidence, throw up their hands as to the bugs and say he is guilty.

Uh......um....sure, Minnie. Whatever you say.

[the Deejay]

Your 762 post..........EXCELLENT!!!!

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

What's funny to me is that RR and his little nobody sidekick thought this trial would launch bigger careers in radio.

I think when it's all over, they will be lucky to have a show at all.

[the Deejay]

You have.........FREEPMAIL CALL!

[Lauratealeaf]

Thanks....just getting inspired by your intelligent and logical thinking...as well as Specs,UCANSEE2, FresDA, Jaded and others..

[the Deejay]

WOW! I am honored to be placed in the group of Specs,UCANSEE2, FresDA, Jaded! Thank Yooooo!!!

Not only was your 762 post EXCELLENT, but very accurate.

[Freedom2specul8]

Interesting comments....

I was wondering why you didn't reply to my earlier posts about the pot..like when I said a video of a child being raped is WORSE than a joint. I was wondering where you were at when I wrote child porn alone is not enough evidence to convict. I wondered what your opinion was when you knew the jurors cried, but not over cartoons. I sure wondered what you thought when you found out the orange fiber defense turned out to be yet another..well NOTHING. I especially wondered what you thought about when you considered susan L's testimony about the closed curtains, the drinking problem and the serious change in personality....and I wondered what your opinion was on when she said he got 'forceful'. I wondered what you thought when she cried..

It is illogical to assume that all the compiled evidence is planted at this point and since neither you nor the defense can explain it all away...well logically, your defense of Dw is weak. I also couldn't wait to her your explanation of why her skin was mummified and I waited anxiously to hear your reaction to the now infamouse mummiologist.

[BARLF]

LOL........Tiny Puddle,teehee. Was the Fat Lady singing in court?

[the Deejay]

Ever how long it takes him, he'd better not lie to the jury on one item, as he did in his opening.

I hope Feldman points out the lies to the jury Dusek told.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

I have to admit that even though I don't usually enjoy someone else's discomfort, I get a certain amount of fun from watching the VDAs today.

Someone ?????? is having a hard time with self-control. LOL !!!!!!!!

[Freedom2specul8]

Self-control does seem to be lacking at times on the DW threads.... Hey, did you hear the latest? ya'll are considered DW groupies.. YIKES!

[Lauratealeaf]

I waited anxiously to hear your reaction to the now infamouse mummiologist.

Did your anxiety about Mummy Mouse cause you to pop a LOT of pills? Do you ever entertain doubt that Westerfield may not be guilty? Not even a little? No thinking about that? Not at all? Always so sure of yourself? Aren't you just a little bit bugged about the insect testimony?

[Freedom2specul8]

Oh Laura... tsk tsk

[Mrs.O'Strategery]

you nor the defense can explain it all away...well logically,

And neither you nor the prosecution can explain how DW kidnapped and murdered Danielle...well not logically anyway! :-)

[Lauratealeaf]

Ok how many weeks will it take Dusek to give his closing statement. 4 including days off for Mudd's fishing trips etc.?

LOL!

[Freedom2specul8]

Touche! HOWEVER...We can safely say it was done, she was kidnapped and murdered...and dw has unexplainable blood, hair and fibers... and child porn in or on his property...too much exchanging and not enought explaining. The defense hasn't denied any of it and they've not proved she played in the MH.