Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Says Sequestering Of Jury Possible: Van Dam case has jurors facing more Mad-Dawgging!!
Union Trib ^ | July 30, 3002 | Alex Roth

Posted on 07/30/2002 7:13:26 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge says sequestering of jury possible

By Alex Roth
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

July 30, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd chastises the media and threatens to cut off video and still-photo coverage David Westerfield's murder trial Thursday, July 25, 2002, in San Diego. Mudd said the problem was due to a security breech when an unnamed person followed some jurors to their vehicles and wrote down license numbers. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam. (AP Photo/Dan Trevan,POOL)The judge in the David Westerfield trial rejected another defense request to sequester the jury but said he still considers it "a possible option."

Superior Court Judge William Mudd said he didn't think it was necessary at the moment but has asked the county to prepare "a back-up contingency plan" just in case.

Westerfield's lawyers have asked several times for jury sequestration, and they renewed their request yesterday. Lead defense lawyer Steven Feldman said he worried that the jury might be affected by the publicity in the Samantha Runnion kidnap-murder case in Orange County.

Feldman cited comments made by Samantha's mother about Alejandro Avila, the man charged with kidnapping and killing the 5-year-old girl. In an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live," Erin Runnion blamed her daughter's death on a jury that acquitted Avila of child molestation charges two years ago.

Feldman said he worried that jurors in the Westerfield case might hear about the interview and feel pressured to convict his client, who is charged with kidnapping and killing 7-year-old Danielle van Dam of Sabre Springs.

The judge said he would remind jurors about news coverage they should avoid. He also said he talked to them about sequestration last week after receiving reports that someone in the media followed some of the jurors to their cars and wrote down their license plates.

"They're a hearty group and they didn't appear to be intimidated by what occurred, and I continue to believe in their integrity," the judge said yesterday.

With the trial in recess for a day, lawyers spent yesterday discussing legal instructions to give to the jury before they begin deliberations. It seems likely that testimony will continue into next week.

Prosecutors are expected to finish their rebuttal evidence today, at which point the defense will put on evidence to rebut the prosecution's rebuttal. One possible defense witness probably won't be called until Monday, Feldman told the judge yesterday.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: 180frank; danielle; kidnapping; molestation; threadjackals; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,021-1,023 next last
To: VRWC_minion
While waiting for court to begin Court TV is playing some of Dusek's opening statement. He does tell the jury that DW washed the SUV before returning home. (Spotless after being at Sherman's for two days)
21 posted on 07/30/2002 9:04:25 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Wasn't there a report of strong bleach in the garage too ?
22 posted on 07/30/2002 9:06:44 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: FresnoDA
JUST FOR RECORDS, ARCHIVES AND EASY OF MOVING FROM THREAD TO THREAD HERE'S A COURTEOUS LINK TO THE
previous thread
24 posted on 07/30/2002 9:09:21 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

Wow...some of the HTML code shriek skill being displayed today is amazing, absolutely amazing...Hmmm...
26 posted on 07/30/2002 9:11:40 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA; All
Posted: 7:40 a.m. PDT April 18, 2002
Updated: 11:33 a.m. PDT April 18, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- A judge Thursday will consider a request by lawyers representing David Westerfield to review the personnel records of 13 officers involved in the investigation of Danielle van Dam's abduction and murder -- that's after he reviews the files himself.


http://www.thesandiegochannel.com/sand/news/stories/news-140532820020418-090423.html

In court documents, defense attorney Robert Boyce said that police ignored his client's requests for a lawyer and questioned him abusively following the 7-year-old's disappearance.

In the days after the second-grader vanished, police were so rough in their questioning that Westerfield "stated that he thought he was abused and all that was missing were the bright lights and a rubber hose," Boyce said in the documents.

The documents maintain that after Westerfield became a suspect, police interrogated him for nine straight hours, ignoring his repeated requests to speak with a lawyer, sleep, make telephone calls, shower, change clothes and halt the interview, according to the documents.

"I asked you to get me a lawyer. Bring me a lawyer in here. Bring the D.A. in. Bring somebody in I can talk to. ... You're asking me to admit to something," Westerfield told police detectives during one interview, the court documents state.

"As far as I'm concerned, I didn't do it. I know that you're adamant that I did."
Westerfield's trial is scheduled to begin on May 17.

Boyce and defense attorney Steven Feldman especially want Superior Court Judge William Mudd to look at records of complaints against detectives Mark Keyser and Mike Ott, who they allege have a history of "dishonesty and excessive force."

Ott and Keyser interviewed Westerfield two days after the girl disappeared and accompanied him on the 600-mile route he said he traveled the weekend Danielle van Dam turned up missing.

They also tried to visit Westerfield in jail the day after the victim's body was found.

Feldman and Boyce want Mudd to review records regarding aggressive conduct or violation of constitutional or statutory rights, including Miranda rights and rights to counsel, in interviewing suspects and witnesses.

Ott and Keyser previously "violated a suspect's constitutional rights, used excessive force and lied," according to a document from Feldman and Boyce.

I belive after this kind of treatment I would get a severe attitude problem as I belive DW did.
Anyone have a working trial link?

27 posted on 07/30/2002 9:12:10 AM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Apparently, fres hasn't realized that your list was dejackaled. If he continues to ignore that fact, I am going to have to demand that you insert ASSJACKAL back into your list. Thank you for your time. ::grin::
28 posted on 07/30/2002 9:13:27 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: VRWC_minion
Not too strong but there was a scent of it, plus the empty bleach container in garbage.

One of the search dogs did react to an area of the garage, btw. They didn't classify it as a "hit" and it wasn't presented to the jury, I don't believe---so the jury can't consider it. The dog info is in the affidavit for search warrant.

30 posted on 07/30/2002 9:13:43 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
There was a report of an empty bleach container in the trash.
31 posted on 07/30/2002 9:14:14 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Full day of testimony today, full day Thursday, lawyers and judge only on Friday, witness maybe on Monday. Then closing arguments and deliberations begin.
32 posted on 07/30/2002 9:15:44 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Mudd has still not made a decision on sequestering the jury during deliberations. (!!!)
33 posted on 07/30/2002 9:16:38 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
~new news~

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/724703/posts

DAYTON | The 36-year-old Arizona man charged Saturday with sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl aboard a Greyhound bus that stopped in Dayton and Springfield might face a mandatory sentence of life in prison. That fate will depend on whether John Clarence Golden Jr. has been convicted of prior sex offenses. On Saturday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz ordered that Golden be held without bail until a preliminary detention hearing set for 10 a.m. today on a charge of crossing a state line with intent to engage in a sexual act with a person under the age of 12. If convicted, Golden would face a mandatory life sentence if he has prior sex offenses.

34 posted on 07/30/2002 9:16:49 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: basscleff
I recommend soaking in a tub full of olive oil...spinkled with rosemary.
36 posted on 07/30/2002 9:17:57 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Mudd mentioning Orange County case (Samantha Runnion), telling jury that there are really no similarities, but try to not watch if they don't have to.

Also mentioned A&E's Body Farm program--commentators include witnesses in this trial...he's putting on the jury's "x-out list."

37 posted on 07/30/2002 9:18:25 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: basscleff
Remember, wash the chlorine off your hands before you eat the pizza.
38 posted on 07/30/2002 9:18:29 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Detective Parga on the stand.
39 posted on 07/30/2002 9:19:15 AM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: shezza
Thank you shezza!
40 posted on 07/30/2002 9:19:55 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 1,021-1,023 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson