Skip to comments.
Judge Mudd Says Sequestering Of Jury Possible: Van Dam case has jurors facing more Mad-Dawgging!!
Union Trib ^
| July 30, 3002
| Alex Roth
Posted on 07/30/2002 7:13:26 AM PDT by FresnoDA
By Alex Roth
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
July 30, 2002
The judge in the David Westerfield trial rejected another defense request to sequester the jury but said he still considers it "a possible option."
Superior Court Judge William Mudd said he didn't think it was necessary at the moment but has asked the county to prepare "a back-up contingency plan" just in case.
Westerfield's lawyers have asked several times for jury sequestration, and they renewed their request yesterday. Lead defense lawyer Steven Feldman said he worried that the jury might be affected by the publicity in the Samantha Runnion kidnap-murder case in Orange County.
Feldman cited comments made by Samantha's mother about Alejandro Avila, the man charged with kidnapping and killing the 5-year-old girl. In an interview on CNN's "Larry King Live," Erin Runnion blamed her daughter's death on a jury that acquitted Avila of child molestation charges two years ago.
Feldman said he worried that jurors in the Westerfield case might hear about the interview and feel pressured to convict his client, who is charged with kidnapping and killing 7-year-old Danielle van Dam of Sabre Springs.
The judge said he would remind jurors about news coverage they should avoid. He also said he talked to them about sequestration last week after receiving reports that someone in the media followed some of the jurors to their cars and wrote down their license plates.
"They're a hearty group and they didn't appear to be intimidated by what occurred, and I continue to believe in their integrity," the judge said yesterday.
With the trial in recess for a day, lawyers spent yesterday discussing legal instructions to give to the jury before they begin deliberations. It seems likely that testimony will continue into next week.
Prosecutors are expected to finish their rebuttal evidence today, at which point the defense will put on evidence to rebut the prosecution's rebuttal. One possible defense witness probably won't be called until Monday, Feldman told the judge yesterday.
TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: 180frank; danielle; kidnapping; molestation; threadjackals; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,021-1,023 next last
To: clearvision
This dip has now said that atleast twice. It must have been a very large fiber!
To: UCANSEE2
Wow! Looks to me like some PC censorship going on around here.
102
posted on
07/30/2002 9:46:27 AM PDT
by
kayti
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I wonder who convinced him to use this orange fiber defense?,More important, why think the pros wouldn't go out and test these ?
Unless on cross he can make this woman sound like she wasn't sure about a match.
To: shezza
Did microscopic and infrared tests. Dog vest was nylon. Orange shirts poly/cotton blend. Orange rope was polyester. Orange strap was nylon. Backpack (red portion) nylon. Frazee's lovely orange hat= polyester. Other shirts were either cotton or poly/cotton blend.
104
posted on
07/30/2002 9:46:46 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: shezza
Orange vest (Laura Recovery Center) was .... (can't remember, looking at notes)...um...it was polyester.
105
posted on
07/30/2002 9:47:39 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: John Jamieson
MAGNUMFIBER = a 27 pound single orange fiber that covered Danielle's body. Listed in GBR as the largest single fiber ever produced.
To: shezza
Witness excused.
107
posted on
07/30/2002 9:48:59 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: VRWC_minion
Another point for the jury to ponder is that the type of fibers found on all of these various random sources don't match the kind found to Westerfield's RV, SUV and home. This will indicate its not so easy to get a match by accident.
To: shezza
Sgt. Holmes on the stand.
109
posted on
07/30/2002 9:49:29 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: UCANSEE2
I'll have to send the definition later tonight. Unfortunately, I must go back to work where I can lurk but not post.
To: kayti
Wow! Looks to me like some PC censorship going on around here.Huh? UCANSEE2 put the phrases together as an inside joke kind of thing. I've never read it, but that's my take----not censorship.
To: John Jamieson
somebody's been listening to Nancy Grace! LOL
To: shezza
Has motorhome similar to DW's Southwind.
113
posted on
07/30/2002 9:50:13 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: VRWC_minion
Different classes of RV, they are both class A. (me=means you need special license to drive)
ARe you familiar with route to Glamis ? =yes
To: VRWC_minion
Exactly! Unless they can turn this around, they just hurt themselves.. Most of the time, atty's know the answer prior to the question. This looks more like grasping at straws.
To: shezza
Takes his MH out 5-6 times a year. Has driven route to Glamis in his MH.
116
posted on
07/30/2002 9:51:25 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: shezza
Usually goes through on his way to Lake Havasu or Colorado destinations.
117
posted on
07/30/2002 9:51:51 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: shezza
VAN DAMNED MOTORHOME ENVY
To: cyncooper
See definition for "dejackaled"... it was a wonderul attempt to promote love, and togetherness. :) on a serious note, ucansee2 is for real...and has no hidden agenda.
To: shezza
Has actually driven the route to Glamis involving Julian area in MH once, has pulled camper on that route several times. Narrow, windy, few services.
120
posted on
07/30/2002 9:53:05 AM PDT
by
shezza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 1,021-1,023 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson