FYI, I didn't create the timeline and only added one event or possibly two. You are correct in that I do have a "bias" for facts over fiction. You or anyone else can say anything they want critical of the Smarts or the police that they can back up with published sources.
We have a career criminal with 5 convictions including shooting a police officer, who has now admited involvement in other crimes involving the Smarts. A criminal who has now been charged with three new state charges and three new federal charges. A criminal who previously worked in the Smart home and had familiarity with ES and the family's home and habits. A criminal that has been named by the police as the prime suspect. A criminal with a flaky alibi who has been described by the police as having "connectivity" to the ES abduction. A criminal who will not account for ALL of his or his Jeep's whereabouts inspite of an offer of immunity during the critical period. Those are well documented facts, not bias.
Instead of throwing out your wild-eyed speculations, how about providing some links from credible published sources which support your positions? I would love to see names of those who had both opportunity and motive. I will be only too happy to add them to the Important Links or time-line section.
You might also want to share your agenda and biases.