Think about this. WHY have the police made such a point of stating publicly that Mary Katherine's story has remained consistent? What benefit is derived from these public statements? There is nothing in Mary Katherine's story that is of any benefit to the public......nothing that would help any of us identify the alleged abductor.
The only real benefit that I can see in repeatedly stating that Mary Katherine's story has not changed is to reassure the abductor that she has not provided police with any additional information. If this is the case, what is the likelihood that it is true?
Because it has been consistent and because reporters have asked questions about it.