The revised description of the kidnapper 2 weeks into the case, given at the same time as the revised quote of the kidnapper by the way spoken to Elizabeth instead of MK, is a description of Ricci's attire because it came from clothing taken by the police in searches of Ricci and his in-laws trailors and shacks. Why did police decide to change the description of the kidnapper's attire from the kidnapper's attire to Ricci's attire? I have no idea, but it revolves around LE's paranoia of releasing any information to the public that will point to the actual kidnapper. Why are they hiding him? Why won't police tell Ed Smart who the kidnapper is and why they're hiding him? Why are police advertising they're not going to make an arrest as long as Elizabeth or her body don't show up? You tell me.
We need to check the timeline on this because I don't believe the police changed the description of the kidnapper's attire - except the cap. I have reason to believe the police had the correct cap info, but for whatever reason it was reported incorrectly.
A preliminary search on the cap indicates that the police reported that it was a tan golf cap in a UPI story on 06/15. The Feds didn't confiscate a cap at the FIL until 06/28 according to the SL Tribune. Why do you keep claiming that the police changed the story AFTER they found the cap at the Ricci's father-in-laws?