Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Good Morning Class. Welcome to School!

Here is my example with WFTD.

While he noted that the circuit's rulings automatically are blocked, or "stayed," for 45 days to give parties time to appeal, he said he wanted to clear up any confusion in the national furor that followed the decision.

"It was a bit of fire control. It's kind of a squirt of a little coolant on the fire until it calms down," said Goodwin, appointed to the bench in 1971 by President Nixon. "I didn't consider it caving in to pressure."

He said the court has been flooded with messages from school districts, in addition to "mindless telephone and e-mail traffic that was tying up the clerk's office and some of the other judges."

An athiest’s agenda most temerarious
With a decision that made us furious
“Mindless calls”
In hallowed halls
This court takes PC to serious!

What really fries my backside about this judge is that he has the never to say his opinion was correct, when in a year, the Supreme Court has overturned 4 of his opinions. The 9th Circus Court is the most overturned court in the nation. The liberals and their temerarious fight to outlaw everything except what they like is going to turn this great place into a nation of wimps and whiners.

Wwwaaaaa, he hurt my feelings, I’m going to sue! Waaaaaaaaa!

Judge Objects to Staying of Pledge Decision

1 posted on 07/02/2002 6:59:46 AM PDT by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: RikaStrom
i am sure that bubba misses the temerariousness of doing this crap while still prez. He still has the capacity to make my blood boil and bring on a bout of Tourrettes'.
104 posted on 07/02/2002 8:48:48 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
The tri-fecta of temerariousness

Sorry in advance to anyone who loses their breakfast.

109 posted on 07/02/2002 8:58:58 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
Temerarious
Budget makes friends into foes
McGreevy, Jersey
120 posted on 07/02/2002 9:12:44 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom; All
Temerarious? Hmmmmmmm, well I guess you could say that driving 'cross country with Taxman and Sauropod is Temerarious, lol.

Y'all know anyone else who is interested in driving through with us?
124 posted on 07/02/2002 9:18:46 AM PDT by dixie sass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
The law, as Dickens famously observed, "is a ass," and now the Europeans are insisting that everyone, including us, kiss it.
The new International Criminal Court is the brainchild of the Utopians, some of whom may be bubbling over with good intentions, but a lot of whom are consumed with penal envy, and long to lock up all American miscreants. "All" includes all of us.
The Bush administration seems determined to protect American soldiers from malicious prosecution, and threatens to use its veto in the United Nations Security Council, to pull the plug on peacekeeping missions in the Balkans, to put the court in its place. Yesterday the administration hinted that it would, with its veto, pull the plug on other peacekeeping missions as they come before the Security Council.

The UN continues with its temerariousness in regard to this farce of a court.

127 posted on 07/02/2002 9:25:27 AM PDT by SeaDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
It isn't political, Miss Rika, but temerariousness was the impetus for selling my last motorcycle.

EODGUY
137 posted on 07/02/2002 9:34:52 AM PDT by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
"Former Vice Perpetrator Algore* temerariously unleashed some hyperbolic rhetoric last weekend in strident criticism of the Bush administration. Most conservatives welcome his piffle, however, since his every word further confirms his ignorance and irrelevance."

* a.k.a. "Prince of Pines"

158 posted on 07/02/2002 9:53:47 AM PDT by TheGrimReaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
It's a bit of a dilemma: deciding which method of getting the kids to our summer vacation spot is more temerarious. With the seemingly total ineptitude of airport screeners, along with the airline's unwillingness to do anything but beg for more taxpayer money, I don't really want to fly.

However, that means driving them for two days each way. Perhaps discussing this article with them beforehand will make the drive more pleasant: To Spank or Not to Spank.

176 posted on 07/02/2002 10:12:47 AM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
I guess there's still hope for kids out there. I just got this from Fastweb (a newsletter / website that notifies you of scholarship contests for high schoolers)

4th Annual Essay Contest on Ayn Rand’s Novel

Attached is last year's winning essay by David Matthew Press,

Capitalism: The Only Moral Economy Capitalism, according to John Galt, is "mutual trade to mutual advantage," (Rand Atlas Shrugged 989) or as Adam Smith put it: "[trade] by mutual consent and to mutual advantage." In true capitalism, the economy is strictly separated from the state, just as there is a separation between church and state in the USA. This basic tenet of capitalism describes the only economic system that can be morally justifiable. Communism, fascism, socialism, dictatorships and "regulated capitalism" are all systems that breach upon an individual's basic rights, while capitalism respects and recognizes a man's right to control the product of his mind. In her philosophical treatise Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand uses fictional characters and events to dramatize the only economy that is consistent with man's rights and virtues.

Before Ayn Rand, no one had ever seriously attempted to justify capitalism on moral grounds. It was a given that capitalism was immoral; the proponents of capitalism merely tried to exhibit the efficiency of the system (i.e., it is a "necessary evil"). Economists did this because they focused only on the people who would be helped by an anti-capitalist society: the "needy." What Ayn Rand presents so masterfully through Atlas Shrugged is the objective perspective of what is occurring in societies where people may take from others for the "public good"; in the novel, she repeatedly begs the question: "At whose expense?" When the People's State of Mexico nationalizes the San Sebastián mines, Ayn Rand clearly presents what is really happening: a gang of looters is robbing an honest business for their own benefit. In any other case, this would be deemed highly immoral, but when it is done in the name of the "public good," the action suddenly becomes noble. By utilizing hard-working and honest heroes and heroines such as Hank Rearden and Dagny Taggart, Ayn Rand presents what really happens to the victims of the "needy."

In essence, capitalism is the only economic system that is compatible with individual freedom. In every other form of economy, a person is, in one way or another, a slave to the non-entity known as the "public good." In the anti-capitalist society of Atlas Shrugged, the Hank Reardens and the Dagny Taggarts of the world are constantly at the mercy of the government's whims and fancies because, whenever it deems that the "public good" is threatened, the government can justify any action towards them. Points one and two of Directive 10-289 — where workers must stay where they work and businesses must stay in operation — clearly illustrate how an anti-capitalist economy can literally enslave its people "In the name of general welfare" (Rand Atlas Shrugged 505).

The right to life is the most important freedom an individual can have, and capitalism is the only system that is consistent with this right. "Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life" (Rand "Man's Rights" 288). This necessarily leads to the notion of the absolute right to private property, the bedrock upon which the moral and practical foundations of the capitalist system rest. By definition, any anti-capitalist system abrogates this right in one way or another. For example, in Communism the "public" owns all property, in a dictatorship the dictator owns everything, and in "regulated capitalism" the government can do whatever it pleases (according to the whims of its legislators) with an individual's "private property."

In Atlas Shrugged, the fifth and seventh points of Directive 10-289 are the most obvious examples of the violation of private property in a non-capitalistic economy. Through this regulation, the government dictates to people what they can and cannot do with their own property: the property that they earned through effort, ingenuity and intelligence. Under the fifth point, a business may no longer produce as much (or as little) as it chooses to; the seventh point prohibits a business to set its own prices. It is clear that these restrictions mean eventual disaster for any company (one can merely look at the roots of the current California power crisis to see this); the government, because it has a monopoly on the licit use of force, compels businesses to destroy themselves or be destroyed. This is tantamount to putting a gun up to a man's head and telling him that he must either kill himself or be killed by the criminal. However, the aforementioned self-immolation is just what the anti-capitalists would advocate; in the society of Atlas Shrugged, sacrifice, not merit, is morality.

Moreover, capitalism is the only economic system that adheres to an objective (i.e., in accordance with reality) set of standards. In this system, people, in general, receive in proportion to their productivity; it is as simple as that. In contrast, the society of Atlas Shrugged applies completely subjective standards because of its mixed economy. Bureaucrats such as Wesley Mouch attempt to give to everyone according to their "need." But how does one define what is needed by men? Does that mean the right to a job, an education, a house, food, two cars, et cetera? How far does the government go until it reaches the state of the Soviet Union? In reality, this need is defined by whatever special interest group carries more weight within the government: Tinky Holloway's unions, the National Alliance of Railroads, the State Science Institute, or any other organization with enough money and lobbyists.

Because it is the only objective system, capitalism is the only economy that can literally be called just. By definition, justice is merely giving a man that which he deserves. When a man deserves something, he acquires it as a result of his behavior or effort. Thus, it is not justice when a man obtains something undeserved, especially if it is at the expense of the merited. By its very nature, capitalism is completely consistent with the previous statement and, consequently, is just. However, the anti-capitalist society in Atlas Shrugged advocates that a man is entitled to what he needs, even if he is a worthless leech who has never lifted a finger in his life. Through methods such as the income tax, this society steals from producers like Dagny Taggart and gives her money to those who did not earn it. Is that justice? It is this society that believes it is moral to steal Hank Rearden's chemical formula so that the corrupt, unproductive and certainly undeserving Orren Boyle can use it without compensation. Is that justice? It is clear that capitalism is the only economic system that gives people what they deserve; capitalism is economic justice.

Capitalism has been proven time and time again to be the most "effective" (in terms of production) economic system in existence, but this is only secondary to the primary fact that it is the only moral economy. In Atlas Shrugged Ayn Rand shows that, by its very nature, capitalism is freedom: the freedom for a man to do what he wants to do with the product of his own mind and effort and, the corollary to that, the freedom to live.

Works Cited
Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. New York: Random House, Inc., 1957.
---. "Man's Rights." Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. New York: The New American Library, 1967. 286-94.

202 posted on 07/02/2002 10:50:30 AM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
Miss Slippy's gonna be glad to get home today...I have a Mark Grace bobblehead for her, and enough tix for FeebleBot, Slippy and I to go see the Diamondbacks tomorrow night....
238 posted on 07/02/2002 1:27:50 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RikaStrom
Miss Rika, here is my homework:

The temerariousness of this idiot teacher is exceeded only by his ignorance of history.

241 posted on 07/02/2002 2:20:54 PM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson