Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Professor says anoraks are bad for you
Ananova ^ | June 27 2002

Posted on 06/27/2002 5:54:27 AM PDT by 2Trievers

A medical expert says anoraks are a possible health hazard.

A study carried out at Birmingham City Hospital found the hooded coats reduce the field of vision by up to half.

The professor behind the research says this can be potentially dangerous when crossing a road.

Philip Murray, an opthalmologist, has published his research in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

He said: "Our researchers measured the binocular visual field of volunteers wearing four different styles of anorak.

"Most wearers pull the hood over their heads and we found that with the hood up the field of vision is more than halved."

The Daily Mirror quotes him as saying: "People need to be far more careful in their choice of head gear. And apart from that they look ridiculous."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
When I wear my anorak up here ... there are no roads to cross! &;-)


1 posted on 06/27/2002 5:54:27 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
We need some "sensible" anorak control laws. It's for the children, you know.
2 posted on 06/27/2002 6:04:33 AM PDT by Gunner9mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Talk about people with too much time on their hands.
Any 10-year-old who lives in cold country can tell you the same thing - when you put the hood up, you can't see squat. But your head stays warm.
This is the same kind of pointy-head "intellectual" thinking that brings us the revelation that four-wheel-drive vehicles which are designed to have high ground clearance, are more likely to tip over when used as high-speed transit machines.... in the hands of complete imbeciles who have no idea why the vehicles is designed the way it is, I dare to add.
3 posted on 06/27/2002 6:08:40 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
And sunglasses are dangerous at night - sheesh.
4 posted on 06/27/2002 6:15:13 AM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
This is one of the most advanced technological studies I have seen. To think that a hooded, eye-slitted, anorak would limit the vision of the person wearing it is just amazing.
5 posted on 06/27/2002 6:24:22 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers; meenie
Original article from the Sunday Herald.

Proof of what children always knew: anoraks are hazardous to your health

By Sarah-Kate Templeton Health Editor

As the favoured outer garment of trainspotters and computer geeks it was always going to be a laughing stock. But the allegations against the much maligned anorak have become more serious. Doctors have discovered what children have long known -- anoraks are bad for your health. Experts at the Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre at Birmingham City Hospital, who have carried out what is thought to be one of the first in-depth pieces of research on the health risks of anorak wearing, have discovered that wearing the hood up can be hazardous.

The main danger comes when the anorak wearer tries to cross the road and turns his or her head to see nothing but a wall of fur.

According to the results of tests carried out by ophthalmologists, vision range with the hood up is more than halved. This, they conclude, is a danger to the anorak wearer and other members of the public.

'Campaigns to reduce road traffic accidents have paid little attention to the way headgear could interfere with vision,' says a report of the research in the Journal Of The Royal Society Of Medicine. The researchers measured the binocular visual field of healthy volunteers while they were wearing four different styles of anorak.

'All four anoraks greatly reduced the horizontal and superior field of vision. The anorak producing the worst reduction resulted in a width of vision of 99¡ and only 15¡ of vision above eye level, versus 167¡ and 52¡ respectively without an anorak.'

And the report advised: 'Anorak wearers should turn their heads to look sideways before crossing the road.'

Professor Philip Murray, one of the researchers, added: 'When the volunteers had the hoods up, their vision was severely reduced. People do need to be more careful.'

Another danger of anorak wearing, not identified in the study but all too familiar to children, is the sport of targeting snowballs so that they hit the small area of face left exposed after the hood is zipped up.

Perhaps this is something the doctors could investigate in further research.

6 posted on 06/27/2002 6:47:32 AM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
As the favoured outer garment of trainspotters and computer geeks...

Doncha love them lumping these two demographics together.

7 posted on 06/27/2002 6:50:56 AM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
"Another danger of anorak wearing, not identified in the study but all too familiar to children, is the sport of targeting snowballs so that they hit the small area of face left exposed after the hood is zipped up."

Thanks fd ... outlawing snowballs in the UK is next on the agenda! Who killed Kenny? LOL &;-)

8 posted on 06/27/2002 7:08:34 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: facedown

9 posted on 06/27/2002 7:11:19 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
...outlawing snowballs in the UK is next on the agenda!

Nah, a five day "cooling off" period will do.

10 posted on 06/27/2002 7:21:33 AM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Oh My God!!! You killed Kenny...You BASTARDS!
11 posted on 06/27/2002 8:22:59 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Good day for a snowball fight, eh Hobbster? LOL &;-)


12 posted on 06/27/2002 8:29:03 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
I don't know. The F*ng air is so thick, flight might not be possible ; )
13 posted on 06/27/2002 8:30:05 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
It's pretty bad at the shore too ... may have to jump in the pool to cool off! &;-P
14 posted on 06/27/2002 8:36:47 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
The professor behind the research says this can be potentially dangerous when crossing a road.

I guess the Brits don't use their neck muscles much...

15 posted on 06/27/2002 8:52:39 AM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Tease :( &nbsp lol.
16 posted on 06/27/2002 8:53:54 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
What kinda "tease" was that again? LOL &;-)
17 posted on 06/27/2002 6:21:44 PM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
A full time pay, part time job, off vacationing already while I am slaving at the Ofc tease! LOL

The &.nbsp (w/out the period) works like t   h   i   s

18 posted on 06/28/2002 4:40:48 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
C O O L ! &;-)

T G I F , e h ?

19 posted on 06/28/2002 4:45:08 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
Amen! (can we say that..Is this a State sponsored forum?)
20 posted on 06/28/2002 4:50:33 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson