Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: codebreaker
Actaully Halle didn't get the female supporting part in the John Travolta summer blockbuster 'Broken Arrow' because the producers didn't think she was believable as a forest ranger.

Well ... maybe that's what they said, but I have to tell you, believability in a role only rarely enters into the question. (Think Michelle Pfeiffer in "Frankie and Johnny." I'm reminded of the reason the producers of the "Charlie's Angels" tv show gave for firing one of the actresses late in the show's run. The official reason was "She doesn't seem smart enough to be one of Charlie's Angels. A friend of mine snorted, "Right. That's like being told you're not handsome enough to play Quasimodo").

Your observation regarding box office is on target. Usually (but not always), that's what drives these decisions.

46 posted on 06/24/2002 9:59:52 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs
And the film may have been pre-'Boomerang' before Halle was a bankable star.
50 posted on 06/24/2002 10:04:21 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs
Well ... maybe that's what they said, but I have to tell you, believability in a role only rarely enters into the question. (Think Michelle Pfeiffer in "Frankie and Johnny."

Yeah, didn't Kathy Bates play that role on Broadway, and Pheiffer got the movie role?

51 posted on 06/24/2002 10:53:03 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson