Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
You gatta be kidding me.
768 posted on 06/16/2002 8:24:41 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson
All I want is for people who may be innocent, to be given the chance to argue their case. We've seen that the government can act without just cause, as it did many times during the Clinton administration.

The legal premise of Habeas Corpus at least allows an American citizen to defend himself because a charge is defined and leveled against them. The present circumstances has Padilla confined, indefinitely, with no charge and chance to refute the claims the government has made. This is bad precedent, Jim. This allows President Hillary to do this to us.

The Friday Wall Street Journal made three recommendations that would be satisfactory. It would establish procedures that would protect our rights, while still allowing action against traitorous Americans when top secret considerations might prevent a standard civil criminal trial. I'll see if I can find the post.

I need to live in a country where if you are innocent, you can defend yourself against an untrue charge levied against you by the government.

784 posted on 06/16/2002 8:31:35 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 768 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson