[pyx]

What you say would be the same as me saying many male Freepers get erections everytime Buchanan, Rush, or Keyes speaks. Thankfully, I have enough tack to avoid such useless immaturity- present post excluded.

WOW ! Thank goodness you have such tack[sic] ! I mean if you had even mentioned it in the first place, I know I might have jumped to the erroneous conclusion you are tactless.

On the other hand, if you had used a FEMALE political counterpart(who is supposedly good looking in the conventional sense of the term) instead of using only male examples in your rebuttal, It wouldn't annoy me that someone claimed I get a woody over seeing a good looking woman, even if I may not. THAT is the difference and there would be no DOUBLE STANDARD then. However, this being FreeRepublic, you instead call for the banning (of sneakypete) for a dissenting opinion. I respectfully disagree with you.

[rintense]

Again, you jump to conclusions. My point is that if those who have been banned are crying because they were banned for saying things on the DitL threads, then perhaps they have nothing to say at all. Anyone who reverts to what I call 'typical liberal flamming' instead of participating in civil discussions will only get flammed in turn. And anyone who unfairly attacks freepers with unmitigated slander, well, they will get their just reward.

For the umpteenth time, it isn't what you say, it's how you say it. And posting, for example, a picture of Nazis (not sneakypete, BTW) instead of actually stating their views in a respectful manner is nothing more than a coward.