Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Sex
ME | 4/15/02

Posted on 04/15/2002 4:17:03 PM PDT by GrandMoM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Savage Beast
...."he, he"...sometimes when I get upset my head goes in a spin. I type faster than I think!
21 posted on 04/15/2002 5:15:16 PM PDT by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I neglected to point out that this "third sex" spin is also scientifically inaccurate and intellectually dishonest- genetically & physically, people are male or female- there's no "third way" possible. You are either one, or the other.
....I'll tell her you said that, okay!
22 posted on 04/15/2002 5:19:42 PM PDT by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
of course, she has no children.

Ah! Well, that kind of clarifies her insouciance, doesn't it?

23 posted on 04/15/2002 5:23:22 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
The "Third sex" is an old idea, originating in Germany.
24 posted on 04/15/2002 5:44:59 PM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
ERRR....a "Third sex?" If that's so, why are they SOOOO unhealthy? Why can't they duplicate themselves? And, why can people switch between a second sex and third sex whenever they want to? Doesn't sound too "created" to me, sounds contrived.
25 posted on 04/15/2002 7:07:41 PM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
Breathes there a man
With hide so tough--
Who says two sexes
Aren't enough?
--Ogden Nash
26 posted on 04/15/2002 7:14:07 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"Why did the Creator mix things up so much? Perhaps He has Plan is beyond our limited comprehension."

Well, like Voltaire, I would have suggested some design changes before the product was released.

There is a serious impedence mismatch between men and women. The way I like to put it: if God had made men half as horny as they are--and women twice as horny as they are, it would be just about right.

Or, much more pithily, I say: "If men were women, we'd all be sluts."

--Boris

27 posted on 04/15/2002 7:17:24 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: boris
While we're at it something needs to be done about the sinuses, the prostate, and who thinks it's a good idea to put all the nerves and blood vessels in the way of light trying to get to the retina...
28 posted on 04/15/2002 7:21:55 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
One thing though...how does homosexuality contribute to procreation? I've never understood that.

Homosexual activity does not. However, if there are genetic factors which influence a person's level of attraction toward the opposite sex vs the same sex (as seems quite plausible) there may be genes which cause people (of either sex) to be more attracted to men than usual, or which case people (of either sex) to be more attracted to women than usual. Either of these types of genes would increase the reproductive odds for people of one sex while reducing them for the other. If the former effect in some circumstances dominates the latter, then genetic disposition to homosexuality is a possible evolved trait.

Of course, this is not to suggest that men who are attracted to other men should act upon such impulses. But I find nothing implausible about the fact that there is a genetic component which promotes such impulses in the first place.

29 posted on 04/15/2002 11:22:10 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
The Tenctonese have three sexes; but then again, they're an imaginary species from another planet who get wasted on sour milk.
30 posted on 04/16/2002 12:54:45 AM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Good idea, Null. And I'm sure it was late at night when He designed the coronaries.
31 posted on 04/16/2002 1:31:54 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: supercat
I think you're right, Cat. Like many biological traits, this probably forms bell curve distribution, with the 2 1/2-5% at one end of the curve obligate heterophiles, the 2 1/2-5% at the other end obligate homophiles. The behavior of the remaining 90-95% is probably skewed toward heterosexuality by other factors, including social pressures, desire to procreate, et al.
32 posted on 04/16/2002 1:44:21 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GrandMoM
There is no more twisted logic then by the sodomites to justify their position.
33 posted on 04/16/2002 7:05:38 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson