[w_over_w]

I have two problems with this article . . .

One, I've been called a lot of things in my life but NEVER a "blog" (I resemble that!) and second, how dare they talk about blogs and not mention FR. Oh the nerve!

[philman_36]

Wouldn't you like to be a blogger too?

On a seperate note, not necessarily intended for you w_over_w...Hugs and kisses?

[Enterprise]

If you give a liberal article a written lashing have you given it a blogging?

[snowfox]

Geez. Go to google, and type in "Blog" and you will get a million friggin' hits. It's the lastest "in" thing. You living in an internet cave?

For instance, and particularly loud-mouthed and annoying blog is andrewsullivan.com

Some conservatives I can really live without.

[Turk D]

Not as if there aren't dreadful web-logs on both sides of the political spectrum with both sides just as misleading as each other with their current events led propaganda. The burden of even-handling of facts just isn't there so wing-nuts of all varieties (from Marxists to the KKK) can post spurious nonsense to impress their politics on any gullible soul who happens to visit their site. Of course the answer to this problem isn't anything to do with censorship. I would suggest it's just requires that the media let the public know how important it is to question (or at least to not unquestioningly rely on) everything they read in such web logs. As far as I can see, that's pretty much as far as the criticism from the 'leftist' press has gone. About right wouldn't you say?