Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rate_Determining_Step
Was that the same 2.3 in the Turbo Coupe they stuck in the Mustang SVO?

Yup. It's a very nice engine. It's pretty strong, and has a lot of potential, too.

The MKIII doesn't count. :) I owned one and put a lot of miles on one. Nice car, but just an anemic 5.0 on the standard 'bird chassis. I still liked the car. Build quality awful. Was rather strange some 25 year old kid with a Lincoln as his car.

True.. A friend of mine (20 years old, BTW), is on his second Mark VII. His first was a '90. It had uncomfortable seats, a lousy interior, it rode poorly, it was noisy, etc. I got a headache from being in it more than 10 minutes. He eventually ended up with an 89. It has a totally different interior which is MUCH nicer, the seats are great, it's quieter, etc. I couldn't believe how much Ford screwed that car up later on. It is pretty slow though, but then again it does weigh 4000 pounds. He had to get it flat-bedded once (bad fuel pump) and the tow truck winch was barely able to pull it up!
45 posted on 03/31/2002 3:11:22 PM PST by mn12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: mn12
Hot damn. 375 RWHP outta a 2.3 is not bad. Site kindda sucked though. Couple of questions. Stock bottom end? Stock ECU? What about fuel system?

:) Standard questions for a turbo car.
49 posted on 03/31/2002 7:36:19 PM PST by Rate_Determining_Step
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson