Constitutionality is, of course, one issue. Are you saying you two agree on the moral and societal consequences issues? I was under the impression you two were on completely different sides of the entire WOD issue.
I've said enough for now. We need aggies input before this goes any further. - And I doubt that it should.
We both oppose the FEDERAL WOD. There is no constitutional president for it. Were we disagree is if states can and should prohibit hard drugs.
I think pot should be legalized, but adamantly defend hard drugs remaining illegal at the state level.
So technically, it would not be a debate on the WOD, but on the constitutionality of States banning drugs.