Replies

To: ksen

Though I'm just as glad that Smeagol wasn't the focus of the rest of the book (no offence intended, Carton ;-).

5,025 posted on 05/10/2002 12:23:15 PM PDT by Sam Cree

To: Sam Cree;carton253;JenB;Overtaxed;HairOfTheDog;Corin Stormhands;All

Though I'm just as glad that Smeagol wasn't the focus of the rest of the book (no offence intended, Carton ;-).

Here's a question: If Smeagol had won out over Gollum, would Frodo's mission have failed?

-Kevin

5,027 posted on 05/10/2002 12:28:57 PM PDT by ksen

To: Sam Cree

No offense... I don't think Smeagol could have carried the story... He's perfect just where he is and for the length he is.

Besides I have always thought the book really was about Aragorn.

Smeagol is a good supporting character only.

5,032 posted on 05/10/2002 12:40:57 PM PDT by carton253

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794