[Scenic Sounds]

That did it. I'm pinging Quix over here. He can straighten all this out. ;-)

[Cathryn Crawford]

Usted es terrible!

...and you revel in it! ROFL

[Quix]

Sorry, was just toooo exhausted and am still toooo busy.

I do wonder, though, given the levity, robust fun, stress releasing and plain silliness that such threads bring out . . .

PERHAPS John could come up with a code for such threads that would always be included in any title of such a thread.

Then, IFFFFFFF

the traffic was below a reasonable threshhold decided by John and Jim, the thread could go forward. If the traffic was above a certain per hour or per minute threshhold on the number of messages, then the system would prevent the thread being included in the message trains.

Perhaps there could be a CODE OF SILLINESS developed to make clear the parameters that were acceptable and those that weren't.

I would hope that in such there would be some warning that people of thin skins would best go elsewhere and would not be molly coddled nor indulged in their whining should they be overly quick or easy in taking offense unnecessarily.

Anyway--may you have some happy silliness in your day.