President Trump Amplifies Explosive “15% Band” Analysis Exposing Democrats’ Algorithmic Pattern in 2026 Midterms by ‘TruthIsFreedom’ Following Gateway Pundit Reports — For Every 1,000 Trump Votes, 150 Shifted to Democrats Across the Map
by Jim Hᴏft Nov. 7, 2026 6:40 pm1406 Comments
President Donald Trump has amplified a bombshell election analysis alleging a remarkably consistent voting pattern across dozens of Senate and gubernatorial races in the 2026 midterm elections.
The theory, dubbed the “85/15 Algorithm” that was originally posted by Truth Is Freedom X account, suggests that Republican candidates received approximately 85% of President Trump's 2024 vote share, while Democrats gained an amount equivalent to the remaining 15 percentage points of Trump's share, as The Gateway Pundit reported earlier.
Trump shared a post from the Truth Social account Truth Is Freedom, which presented the alleged statistical pattern across 59 Senate and gubernatorial contests.
The analysis compared the 2026 results with Trump's performance against Kamala Harris in 2024.
According to the post, one mathematical formula reportedly describes the shift:
Republican 2026 vote share = 0.85 × Trump's 2024 vote share
Democrat 2026 vote share = Harris's 2024 vote share + 0.15 × Trump's 2024 vote share
In plain English: for every 1,000 Trump points from 2024, roughly 850 stayed with the Republican candidate while 150 landed on the Democrat side. Republicans retained about 85% of Trump's share in Senate races and 86% in gubernatorial races. The formula explains 88% of the variation.
What makes the pattern so suspicious is its uniformity. It did not matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, and Massachusetts all showed the same roughly 15% shift (p = 0.69).
The Democrat gain was sized by Trump's 2024 vote total, not Harris's. Drop any single state and the multiplier stays tightly between 0.846 and 0.853. The 0.85 multiplier outperformed standard election-swing models in every set of races tested.
Why Key Seats Flipped At the 0.85 level, any state where Trump received under about 58.5% in 2024 falls below 50% for the Republican candidate in 2026. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, and North Carolina all sat under that line. All of them flipped. Two completely different sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, yet the same 15% decrease almost everywhere. Midterms are normally messy.
This one was not.
The Gateway Pundit previously documented the impossible “Drop and Roll” pattern in 2020, in which massive late-night ballot dumps for Biden in battleground states were followed by subsequent batches that locked in nearly perfect Biden-to-Trump ratios, solidifying Democratic victories.
That analysis, first published November 18, 2020, remains unexplained by any election expert without invoking the likelihood of fraud. The associated video has been viewed millions of times.
.......................................
YOu gotta hand this to Gateway they did one heck of a job in putting this together.Well done.
Now all we need to know is whether or not the data center in Belgrade is still operative or not.Inquiring minds... .................................................
made possible by The lindell offense fund
https://electioncrimebureau.com/fn-ra-07/
Dominion Election Systems in Arizona Are Accessible from Serbia/China (Serbia/China)
Patrick Colbeck June 3, 2026
Reasonable Inference
Dun & Bradstreet corporate records confirm that:
Dominion Voting Systems began operations in Belgrade, Serbia in May 2011 and established its primary data center there, with Huawei Technologies identified as a strategic infrastructure partner. Huawei is designated under § 889 of the FY2019 NDAA as a prohibited supplier for U.S. government information infrastructure.
Arizona's Maricopa County deployed Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5B for the 2020 election.
Citations Mesa County Forensic Report No. 2:
https://useip.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/mesa-county-forensic-report-no.-2.pdf |
US Election Integrity Plan CSO Online,
“One election-system vendor uses developers in Serbia” (Oct. 5, 2016),
https://www.csoonline.com/article/558253/one-election-system-vendor-uses-developers-in-serbia.html stolenelectionsfacts.com, “Dominion set up its primary data center in Serbia with Huawei…” (May 3, 2011)
https://stolenelectionsfacts.com/2011/05/03/dominion-voting-system-build-your-first-datacenter-in-belgrade-serbia/ Maricopa County, “Voting Equipment Facts”, https://www.maricopa.gov/5539/ Voting-Equipment-Facts Made possible by the Lindell Offense Fund EVIDENCE
Here is the evidence of election fraud that we are told does not exist. Not only does this site capture each of the 824 findings documented in the landmark 2020 Election Report:
An Attack Upon U.S. Critical Infrastructure,
but, we continue to add findings on a regular basis. All of the findings presented have been obtained as the result of OSINT investigations and feature supporting citations.
This means that this compendium is the FLOOR not the ceiling when it comes to the volume of evidence in support of the assertion that the security our U.S. election systems have been compromised.
Government officials have access to significantly more evidence that is not available to the public at this time.
We do not ask you to agree with every finding. We simply ask you to look at the records that were deleted, the logs that are missing, the statutes that were ignored, and the national-security standards that were violated—and to decide whether ‘no evidence’ is an honest description of that record.
Search across all evidence postings
Election Crime Bureau:
2020 Election Report Rebuts Claims of “No Evidence”
Patrick Colbeck June 24, 2026
The Election Crime Bureau (ECB) has released an 799‑page report, The 2020 Election:
An Attack Upon U.S. Critical Infrastructure, which it says provides the very evidence of election‑system malfeasance that public officials and media outlets have repeatedly claimed “does not exist.”
The report presents 824 findings and 2,517 citations to argue that the 2020 general election must be investigated as an attack on U.S. critical infrastructure rather than treated as a closed political dispute. 
The citizen‑led study compiles Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) from sworn testimony, court filings, inspector‑general reports, vendor invoices, FOIA records, and open‑source intelligence.
Organizing it across ten distinct “attack vectors” — election record integrity, electronic voting system configuration, certification practices, judicial foreclosures, information control, private funding, privatized operations, weaponization of government, seditious conspiracy, and foreign interference.
These attack vectors converged in ways that individually justify federal grand jury review and collectively represent a serious assault on democratic infrastructure.
Citing evidence from all of the 2020 battleground states and multiple foreign entities, the report documents cross‑jurisdiction patterns such as synchronized destruction of election records before oversight, uniform deviations from certified system baselines, pressure on certification officials, and procedural barriers that obstructed the examination of the underlying evidentiary record. It also highlights documented election‑system vulnerabilities —
Including 319 critical‑severity and 1,820 high‑severity issues identified by CISA in the year before the election — as inconsistent with their own assurances that 2020 was “the most secure election in American history.
” The ECB argues that, in light of this record, broad claims that there is “no evidence” of malfeasance are themselves no longer credible. “Every independent forensic layer capable of confirming or disproving the integrity of the 2020 election result has been systematically removed — and the officials who removed it faced no accountability while those who preserved evidence were prosecuted.
\ This is not the record of institutional failure so much as it is the record of institutional neutralization.” Patrick Colbeck COO Lindell Management The ECB recommends 18 federal investigations (with eight immediate search warrants) into vote‑tally and ballot chain‑of‑custody, post‑election destruction of records in multiple states, alleged false statements by officials and vendors, private election funding arrangements, censorship programs, and foreign‑exposed supply chains.
It further proposes 13 federal and 15 state legislative reforms to require preservation and public disclosure of election records, prohibit unauthorized connectivity, regulate vendors as critical‑infrastructure contractors, ban private operational control over election administration, and protect whistleblowers and audits.