Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Talk" to A.I. Like the Non-Sentient Slave It Is
Dissident News | 10-23-2026 | Charles Oconnell

Posted on 10/23/2026 9:47:35 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell

That non-sentient inferior imitation of co-creative and God ensouled humanity which terms itself "ChatGPT": Thing, do "it" (not "you") research whether the Hollies' song about "Carousel" preceded, succeeded or was unrelated in influence against the Beatles' "Helter Skelter"?

The Hollies' "On a Carousel" and the Beatles' "Helter Skelter"

The Hollies' "On a Carousel" preceded the Beatles' "Helter Skelter" by approximately 21 months. However, the evidence favors independent composition rather than direct musical influence.

Chronology

CategoryThe HolliesThe Beatles
SongOn a CarouselHelter Skelter
ComposersGraham Nash, Allan Clarke, Tony HicksPaul McCartney (credited Lennon–McCartney)
RecordingJanuary 11 and 13, 1967Principal released recording: September 9, 1968
ReleaseFebruary 10, 1967November 22, 1968
Musical characterMelodic, harmony-rich psychedelic popAggressive, distorted hard rock

The Question of Influence

1. The Hollies' carousel as a romantic metaphor

Graham Nash recalled that the three songwriters developed the idea of a love affair resembling a carousel, going round and round. Their objective was a memorable pop single, with strong hooks and the Hollies' characteristic vocal harmonies.

2. McCartney's helter-skelter as a fairground amusement

In Britain, a helter-skelter is a tall spiral slide, commonly encountered at fairgrounds.

McCartney used the image of ascending and descending to accompany a musical experience of increasing excitement and disorder.

In a November 20, 1968 interview, McCartney explained that he had read an enthusiastic description of another group's supposedly wild, noisy recording. When he heard the record, he found it considerably more restrained than advertised and decided to make something genuinely raucous himself.

The recording usually associated with this account is the Who's I Can See for Miles (1967), not the Hollies' On a Carousel.

3. Shared imagery without demonstrated musical borrowing

The Hollies employ circular motion as a metaphor for recurring emotional experiences in love. McCartney uses the excitement of a fairground slide to express musical abandon.

Both songs belong to a period when British popular musicians were experimenting with childhood imagery, amusement parks, fantasy, and psychedelic associations.

That cultural background offers a plausible explanation for their similarity without requiring direct borrowing.

A Revealing Contemporary Document

A February 18, 1967 issue of Disc and Music Echo, published immediately after On a Carousel, interviewed Graham Nash about his desire to make the Hollies more adventurous.

Nash discussed the Beatles' Strawberry Fields Forever, expressing his desire for the Hollies to produce something similarly startling rather than continue playing safe.

This documents the Hollies' awareness of the Beatles' experiments in February 1967, but it does not establish a connection between On a Carousel and the later Helter Skelter.

Conclusion

"On a Carousel" (1967) preceded "Helter Skelter" (1968), but no documented compositional influence between them has been established.

The comparison nevertheless identifies a genuine shared feature: two British popular songs using fairground machinery as an organizing metaphor for emotional or physical excitement, within less than two years of one another.

The relationship is best classified as a noteworthy parallel in popular-song imagery, not an established case of musical borrowing.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: ai; nobodyaskedyou; palantir; pippin; thiel
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

Palantir lies to Peter Thiel just as the Orthanc Stone, the "Palantir" lied to sauron, leading to "its" destruction, as the Seeing Stone spoofed Pippin as the Ring Bearer, while Frodo and Samwise Gamgee crept around the armies of Mordor, to deliver the Ring to its fate.

How would you expect that A.I. would NOT lie to you, since its remote ancestry derives from Newspapers, the chief assignment of which was to give people 99 truths so they would swallow JUST ONE LIE at the behest of their Oligarchic owners--their descendants now Thiel, Soros, Gates, Red Shields, Rocky Fellers, all the putrid crew of them today, who own the A.I. fraud outright, though they can make peasants like us pay for it.

1 posted on 10/23/2026 9:47:35 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

How soon after both songs' composition did Charles Manson begin to use "Helter Skelter" in his demented, demonic, race-war-inciting "philosophy"?

Charles Manson and the Beatles' "Helter Skelter": 1967–1969

Charles Manson began incorporating the Beatles' "Helter Skelter" into his apocalyptic race-war ideology approximately five weeks after the song was released, around New Year's Eve 1968.

The chronology is unusually well documented, including eyewitness testimony from Manson's followers.

Chronology: 1967–1969

DateEvent
February 10, 1967The Hollies release On a Carousel.
July 18, 1968The Beatles record early versions of Helter Skelter.
September 9, 1968The Beatles record the version ultimately released.
November 22, 1968Helter Skelter is released on the White Album.
December 31, 1968Manson begins explaining his interpretation of the Beatles' album to followers at a desert ranch.
January–June 1969His racial-apocalypse narrative becomes progressively more elaborate.
August 8–10, 1969Members of the Manson Family commit the Tate–LaBianca murders.

The Crucial Eyewitness Testimony

Paul Watkins, a former Manson follower, testified that Manson returned to the desert ranch around New Year's Eve 1968 and began explaining that the Beatles were prophesying a revolution.

Watkins emphasized that the complete doctrine did not emerge immediately. Manson elaborated it gradually over approximately five or six months.

By the summer of 1969, according to testimony summarized in the California appellate decision People v. Manson, Manson was advocating murders intended to provoke retaliatory racial violence.

An Important Distinction About Causation

Manson's racist and apocalyptic ideas did not necessarily originate with the Beatles' song. Former follower Catherine Share later recalled that Manson interpreted the White Album as confirmation of ideas he had already been expressing.

Consequently, the more precise historical conclusion is that Manson appropriated the song's title and imagery to reinforce and elaborate an existing ideology, rather than deriving the entire ideology from Paul McCartney's composition.

Comparison with the Hollies

There is no established connection between the Hollies' song and Manson's ideology. Nor is there evidence that McCartney intended anything resembling Manson's interpretation.

Conclusion

The particularly disturbing historical fact is the speed of the transformation: a British pop song about a fairground slide became, within weeks of publication, a phrase employed by Manson in preaching racial apocalypse.

2 posted on 10/23/2026 9:49:21 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell (Kuc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Don’t bother reading this. Go back to cable news. Drool. Snooze. Don’t bother waking up when the skyline glows alight.


3 posted on 10/23/2026 9:52:18 PM PDT by CharlesOConnell (Kuc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

To Late
Scanned for something TEOTWAWKI
at One AM


4 posted on 10/24/2026 1:00:16 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (What's In Your Bucket List?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

My Timing is Pretty good—’NO?
Back to Stupid Cat Videos.


5 posted on 10/24/2026 1:01:52 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (What's In Your Bucket List?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

My Timing is Pretty good—’NO?
Back to Stupid Cat Videos.


6 posted on 10/24/2026 1:01:59 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (What's In Your Bucket List?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

My Timing is Pretty good—’NO?
Back to Stupid Cat Videos.


7 posted on 10/24/2026 1:02:01 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (What's In Your Bucket List?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

How in the heck would anyone even think HS was in anyway derivative of On a Carousel. The very premise makes no sense.

Might as well do the same comparison between Carousel and For the Benefit of Mr. Kite because ya know fairs and stuff.


8 posted on 10/24/2026 2:24:31 AM PDT by Adder ("A pack of jackasses led by a lion is superior to a pack of lions led by a jackass.” GW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Again, no link.


9 posted on 10/24/2026 4:24:25 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson