Posted on 10/15/2026 8:48:21 AM PDT by Drew68
Tom Cruise delivers the performance of his career in a movie whose real subject only comes into focus after it has already started playing with your head.
Near the beginning of Alejandro González Iñárritu’s “Digger,” oil baron Digger Rockwell (Tom Cruise) is briefing the president and his Cabinet.
Digger, preoccupied with his terminally ill cat, has just set off a calamitous global environmental disaster and is meeting with the president to mitigate the fallout.
None of us, not even the most rational people, is immune to the power of emotional messaging.
The president, played by a slimmed-down John Goodman, is an over-the-top blowhard. He’s an amalgam of Donald Trump, both Bushes, and every villainous conservative politician in the history of cinema. He is flanked by a comically weak vice president, a square-jawed racist general, and a sycophantic Bible-thumping preacher.
It was funny, and I was mesmerized by the production design and cinematography. But I thought, “Why the lazy stereotypes?”
I knew Iñárritu was smarter than this, and I knew Tom Cruise wouldn’t settle for anything less than excellence. So why was the story driven by the lead character’s stupidity? Why were the other characters such hackneyed tropes? It didn’t make sense.
Then the plot twisted. My jaw dropped, and I spent the next two hours on the edge of my seat, hypnotized by what might be the greatest film of a generation.
"Digger" is an incredible film for many reasons. First, the entire cast is brilliant, and this is the best performance of Tom Cruise’s career.
There’s more to admire in the writing, Richard Johnson and Dennis Gassner’s production design, Emmanuel “Chivo” Lubezki’s heroic cinematography, the sound design and editing, and Jacqueline West’s costumes. Every aspect of the movie serves to complete the gestalt.
But what makes this film truly great is that it is unlike anything that has come before it. People ask whether it is comparable to “Dr. Strangelove” or “Citizen Kane,” but those are the wrong analogies. The closest comparison might be the moment in “The Wizard of Oz” when Toto reveals that the Wizard is merely an ordinary man behind the curtain.
Another curious thing about “Digger” is that it is executed so masterfully that it strikes an implicit bargain with its audience: Don’t spoil it. So I’m not going to ruin it for you.
And no, it’s not a movie about climate change or the oil industry. The environmental catastrophe is merely a plot device, and the stated climate science “facts” are laughably absurd, which I suspect is by design.
“Digger” is a film about the power of storytelling, but not in the way you think. It is about the nature of performative political hate and how our elites shape the narrative to let us believe we’re winning even as the world around us falls apart.
The film is a devastating critique of politicized art, which has not only become normalized but has provided endless fodder for political commentators on both sides of the aisle.
But “Digger” can’t be easily categorized through an ideological lens. And since it is an indictment of the entire infotainment complex, small wonder critics gave it a lukewarm reception.
Warner Bros.’ marketing campaign didn’t do “Digger” any favors. Unable to reveal the real plot, the trailers were misleading. Tom Cruise’s promotional blitz could only concentrate on the film’s technical triumphs, of which there are many. It’s a shame more people didn’t turn out, but there is no way to explain the plot without revealing the twists, which don’t stop coming until the credits roll.
There’s a scene in the middle of the film where Digger offers the scientist Ganesh (played by the great Riz Ahmed) a piece of bluefin sashimi. Ganesh declines, citing moral concerns over declining bluefin tuna populations.
Digger tells Ganesh a story. It’s about the man who raised the tuna and how lovingly he cares for them. Among other things, the fish farmer gives the tuna daily massages and even sings to them.
Elated by the heartfelt story, Ganesh relents and eats the sashimi. But then we learn that the tale of the tuna farmer is a complete fabrication. Digger has no idea where the tuna came from. He just knows it’s delicious.
The point is that a good story, told artfully, can overcome rational resistance or moral objection.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
He's got a growing following on X and is most assuredly not woke. In fact, wokeness is what drove him away from the industry.
He's been singing the praises of "Digger" --now regarded as a box office flop for Tom Cruise, so I thought I'd offer up his perspective.
Don’t let anyone spoil another movie pumping “the Message.”
And that message is a new one. It turns out Conservstives are evil, Nazi, racists who want to destroy the environment. A movie whose “Message” is the very font of novelty.
I look forward to any Freepers who go see it and report back.
I heard the box office was terrible and it may not be in theaters very long. Which also implies that the word of mouth , where people encourage family and friends to go see it, isn’t happening.
Plenty of right wingers on Twitter have raved about Digger, so it’s probably fine with conservative sensibilities while perhaps offending the left.
I'm gonna try to avoid the spoilers because I really want to see it. Problem is, I'm just not a cinema guy these days. I hold out until it hits the streaming services (of which, I subscribe to all of them).
A few people I follow on X have said the film is spectacular. I think it's bombing because it's something hard to market and Cruise's role is playing out of type.
It sounds like a movie I’d like to see. Screw the critics - they’re all doctrinaire Lefties.
I can’t stand Scientologist Tom Cruise. Don’t care how good it is seeing him in it is a non starter for me.
Trying to save this bomb of a flick, I guess.
I'm thinking from what I've read, "Digger" is actually a satire of the "message movie."
Courageous and Brave!
I read a review that said - “this movie standard, climate-change propaganda and silly liberal caricatures, created in the bubble that is Hollywood, the only place remaining in the USA where you can still get away with it.”
Quote: “ I’m thinking from what I’ve read, “Digger” is actually a satire of the “message movie.”
Except nobody is getting that.
I did know anything about it until I heard that it flopped. Another movie like “Coyote vs. Acme” or “Idiocracy” that Hollywood doesn’t want you to see but is contractually obligated to release it?
“The best film I have ever seen”: Neil Young puts Tom Cruise’s Digger on his top shelf
That says everything I need to know. Hard pass.
WOW THIS REAL NEWS. Haha
But (the movie is telling us) it's OK to employ racist and sexist stereotypes to lambast conservatives if it's a play within a play!
No, it isn't!
Regards,
Grr… Should be: “I did _not_ know anything about the film…”
Yes, that excuses everything, doesn't it?
I mean: I could produce a big-budge Hollywood movie filled with lazy, shiftless, or outright criminal Black men and Black welfare mommas - as long as I was careful to label it a satire, right?
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.